Our search yielded 5,882 studies, of which six RCTs met our inclusion criteria. We excluded most papers due to being retrospective studies (3,920), with others being off topic/not written in English (1,049), reviews/meta-analyses (408), editorials (131), case reports (22), surveys (21), datasets (24), or protocols (26). Among 196 prospective studies, six were RCTs. For these six RCTs, three utilized AI to aid in diagnosis using either mammography or ultrasound, while the rest involved medical counseling, psychological support, and supportive care. Three studies reported significant results in their primary and/or secondary outcomes: (1) use of AI improved recall rate of mammogram readings; (2) AI improved the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of detecting lymph node metastasis in ultrasound readings; and (3) an AI app enhanced patients’ mental health and quality of life. We found two studies had high risk-of-bias, one had some concerns for bias, and three had low risk-of-bias.