There was no difference in the MLH measurements between the high and low risk groups (p=0.16). When evaluating the correlation between MLH measurements of area, width and length with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFIQ-7 and PFDI-20 total scores) stratified by high and low risk, these correlations were not significant (all p-values >0.05). The correlations between MLH area and total PFIQ and PFDI score in the high-risk group were 0.08 and -0.18, respectively. In the low-risk group, the correlations between MLH area and PFIQ and PFDI scores were 0.026 and 0.083, respectively. When adjusting for confounding factors (age, BMI, smoking status, fetal weight, and time since delivery), there was no significant difference in the US measurements when comparing high and low-risk obstetric groups (p-values >0.5).